Suffering refers to human experience of
enduring specific problems, load, and wounds towards the body and mind in different
forms (Kleinman, 1997). The aim of healthcare always is to alleviate suffering.
Understanding suffering is essential in health care practice. The meanings of
suffering are culturally different. I think the reason may be that suffering is
an aspect of inner experience, a reaction to misfortune in life. The
interaction between individuals and the society is influenced by cultural
values, which involves subjective self-consciousness.
I was impressed with the assumption in
Dickson’s article (2003) that Korean culture affects the way in which people
respond to pain, as well as face suffering. It is true, at least according to
my own experience that Korean women have unusual pressure in Korean society
which is male-dominated, because they are expected to look after all the
families, including three generations in some cases. In addition, older age in
Korean culture means respectable states and honor. All of these distinct
meanings make Korean women perceive pain differently. Sometimes pain and
illness become their secret, which are hided in front of their families. What’s
more, they would experience through the process of struggling, striving to
decrease pain, and then tolerating the pain by themselves, because they view
pain as an inevitable part of aged life. In this way, physicians could improve
healthcare and pain management through considering patients’ cultural beliefs.
I also was reminded that there is a question
of balance between time and effectiveness. How could healthcare practitioners
provide effective service within limited time and resource? They usually have inadequate
time, or money to explore the cultural characteristics of the patients. In my
opinion, it is essential, at least, for health care providers to keep the culturally
sensitive perception in mind. It means physicians should notice patients’ cultural
background and take it into account in diagnosis and therapy.
Human life is filled with suffering and
desire, pain and joy. Suffering is unendurable since it conflicts with the
desire of goodness. Thus human are usually fighting with good and evil. It is a
process of resistance, bearing and struggling with the distress of pain of body
and spirit. Therefore, I am thinking whether suffering could be a power that
inspires people to seek human’s desire. When people are suffering a certain
kind of pain or sickness, they usually struggle to reduce the pain, to pursue “good”
states that is consistent with their expectation.
Then, I was enlightened by the point that to
prevent this resistance, political violence is used to create hopelessness
through suffering. Undoubtedly, dominant power needs to suppress criticism in
order to maintain the domination. As we mentioned earlier, suffering can
produce energy to resist, as well as sense of helplessness which result in
silence. That is also the way in which dominant system keeps power and control.
Human trauma can lead to silence of people. Silencing exists in the context of
access to power. The dominant social actors have more chance to construct the
priorities of the healthcare system. On the other hand, the voices of marginalized
communities always are mute, who are hard to access to the health care
resources and basic materials of life. They have no access to express their
voices, and as time goes by, they lose the hope and desire to shout their
voices out. They are numb, and physicians and policy maker as well. However, the
voices of marginalization should be heard and represented in policy to
accomplish social change.
It also reminded me that in a society which
is controlled by absolute dominant actors, it is more difficult to find out and
address the challenging that marginalized people encounter. Sometimes dominant
power creates a “safe” atmosphere on the surface and ignores the voice of
marginalization. I am thinking the problem in China. It is likely that people
who are marginalized believe no one can help except themselves. What they can
do is to “climb up” to “dominant society” and gain the power to change their
life through higher education and all the efforts, despite many people still
are struggling in the dark. Unfortunately, little research and attentions are
paid in suffering of marginalized communities. It is partly caused by abnormal
state of the society. The society is supposed to be “in harmony”. The poorer
and marginalized people are victim of sacrifice. What do we researchers do in
the context? To heal it, I think, is to figure out a balance between the center
of power and marginalized individuals. What it means is to explore how the
dominant policy systems influence suffering and lead to further change through the research
of culture.
Very good insights. Indeed, the social "harmony" that dominant powers talk of is a utopian concept and an convenient argument to put the marginalized in control. For health and development and social change, the voices of the poor are very important. The challenge is how to identify the invisible voices and how to make them heard. Maybe, we researchers can play a role there. But the associated critical question here is how to make space for the vulnerable voices when the researcher does not stay back or is not able to provide protection for the vulnerable voices. Silencing is very dependent on fear and violence which is routinely inflicted upon the marginalized both structurally and physically. That is the larger question.
回复删除A smaller though equally important question is building cultural skills in medical practice so that they can understand the connection between culture and suffering while treating patients.